<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><rss xmlns:atom='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/' xmlns:georss='http://www.georss.org/georss' version='2.0'><channel><atom:id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12130599</atom:id><lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 14:39:08 +0000</lastBuildDate><title>Five</title><description>Independent Political Coverage</description><link>http://www.five.org/blog/</link><managingEditor>noreply@blogger.com (Deek Deekster)</managingEditor><generator>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>142</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12130599.post-115049119191810096</guid><pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 20:52:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2006-06-16T21:53:11.930+01:00</atom:updated><title>WIPO Puts Podcasting Back In Firing Line</title><description>From BoingBoing: &lt;i&gt;&lt;B&gt;WIPO meets to screw up podcasting, Barcelona, June 21&lt;/B&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The United Nations' World Intellectual Property Organization has called a last-minute meeting on June 21 in Barcelona, out of the normal diplomatic venues to try to ram through the Broadcasting Treaty. This treaty gives broadcasters (not creators or copyright holders) the right to tie up the use of audiovisual material for 50 years after broadcasting it, even if the programs are in the public domain, Creative Commons licensed, or not copyrightable.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Barcelona meeting brings together lots of latinamerican broadcasters -- who no doubt love the idea of a new monopoly right that they get for free merely for broadcasting a work. Bringing these casters in is a way of undermining the effective opposition to the treaty that's come from countries like Brazil and Chile.... This meeting is especially deadly, because it looks like they're trying to sneak podcasting back into the treaty, after agreeing to take it out at the last big meeting in Geneva.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The good news is, it's open to the public. If you're a digital rights activist in Barcelona -- or just someone who cares about how big corporations are taking away your rights to use works freely -- then you need to be at this meeting.&lt;/i&gt;</description><link>http://www.five.org/blog/2006/06/wipo-puts-podcasting-back-in-firing.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Deek Deekster)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>3</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12130599.post-114461949829542266</guid><pubDate>Sun, 09 Apr 2006 21:50:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2006-04-09T23:53:18.270+01:00</atom:updated><title>UK Podcasters Meet BBC</title><description>&lt;TABLE&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.podcastnation.co.uk/podblog/blogpix/podcastpaul_conradslater.jpg" /&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;FONT SIZE=1&gt;Conrad Slater (left) and "Podcast" Paul (right) observing BBC Television Centre in April sunlight&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;A group of UK podcasters spent two hours in deep in the bowels of BBC Television Centre yesterday discussing UK podcasting. Chris Vallance of Radio Five Live's &lt;A HREF="http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio/aod/networks/fivelive/aod.shtml?fivelive/pods_blogs" target=_blank&gt;Pods and Blogs&lt;/A&gt; invited British podcasters to discuss podcasting, broadcasting and where the two might meet up.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;We were joined by Rhod Sharp, host of "Up All Night", BBC radio producer Dominic Laurie, and Rebecca Myatt from &lt;A HREF="http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/programmes/outlook.shtml" target=_blank&gt; World Service Outlook&lt;/A&gt; who expressed her interest in finding podcasts for their audience of 140 million.&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Present at this historic event were a mixture of podcast producers from businesses deriving income to passionate enthusiasts, all reporting rapidly quickening growth in the podcast phenomenon, which was attributed partly to the BBC's recent promotion of podcasting. There are well over 250 active UK podcasters right now and it was acknowledged that it is beginning to emerge as a source of talent with new ideas and voices emerging.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Inital talk was about the freedom and independence enjoyed by the podcasters as opposed to the relatively tight restrictions which apply to BBC podcasters. Rhod Sharp described podcasting as being "six feet under the totem pole" as far as the BBC were concerned. Paul Pinfield made the point that the BBC set globally acknowledged standards. Chris Vallance played some podcasts from Germany and Pakistan, making the point that these were genuine voices, untouched by editorial considerations or censorship, and speaking in a natural way that non-broadcasters use. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;There was discussion about how the BBC is set up to respond to and deal with citizen-submitted media from mobile phones, etc, with the example given of images coming in from July 7th London bombings. The BBC podcast "experiment" was debated, and issue of MCPS-PRS podcast license was raised, the BBC not yet aware that such a license exists. Rhod Sharp commended the &lt;A HREF="http://creativecommons.org" target=_blank&gt;Creative Commons&lt;/A&gt; concept as a flexible and easy to understand licensing system for UK citizens which could be easily adopted.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;What made podcasting different was it's genuineness and intimacy, said Janet Parkinson from Flashing 12, a self-confessed hobbyist. Responding to emails and having interaction with your audience was crucial, she said. UK podcasting output is distinctive, has good production values, and does well internationally, observed Neil Dixon. The Britcaster forum which he runs was was intelligent and remarkably "troll free"; he acknowledged that he had to deal with spurious entries to his British listing from people who wanted to be in the "British only" listing and noted one new addition per day. Paul Pinfield who spoke of his interest in the business side of podcasting and offered his view that podcasting would soon replace local radio, which was "total crap". There was strong group of music podcasters present. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Dean Whitbread talked about the empowerment of podcasting, where the writer producer and editor has the advantage of being able to vary formats and combine media in original ways, adding different kinds of material to the same RRS feed.  I asked whether an independent podcast used by the BBC would automatically be covered by existing BBC agreements regarding music licensing - the consensus was yes, it would be. Mark Crook pointed out that as podcasting was now on school curriculums, we could expect to see more young people becoming podcasters as they learn to use the tools. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As the discussion ended, the quietly smiling 23 year old &lt;A HREF="http://www.bitjobs.net/" target=_blank&gt;Phil "Bitjobs"&lt;/A&gt; from Birmingham was spirited away into the bowels of BBC by a crew "looking for somewhere domestic" to shoot a TV interview. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;After the meeting we were joined by filmmaker Conrad Slater, and &lt;A HREF="http://www.adrianpegg.co.uk/" target=_blank&gt;Adrian Pegg&lt;/A&gt;, as the debate re-convened in local Shepherds Bush pub the Defector's Weld for a Britcasters get-together. The jolly-up centred around the benign figure of Neil Dixon who set up the &lt;A HREF="http://britcaster.com" target=_blank&gt;Britcaster forum one year ago. &lt;/A&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In this recording, Chris Vallance interviews the assembled podcasters, as with multiple recording devices, they record him interviewing them. At one point Podcast Paul's microphone is clipped to a pint of beer, and my Sony Minidisc recorder is balanced on a sauce bottle. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;There is widespread praise for Roger Smalls, Neil Dixon describes himself as the Daddy and confesses to many moods, &lt;A HREF="http://podcastpaul.com/" target=_blank&gt;Podcast Paul&lt;/A&gt; admits that UK Podcasters are Radio Caroline, &lt;A HREF="http://calmcast.blogspot.com/" target=_blank&gt;Paul Pinfield&lt;/A&gt; talks business and praises Vobes, Deek Deekster gives bandwidth and expresses his pleasure in finding &lt;A HREF="http://djwithoutaneye.blogspot.com" target=_blank&gt;folk music in urban Isington&lt;/A&gt;, &lt;A HREF="http://parkylondon.libsyn.com/" target=_blank&gt;Janet&lt;/A&gt; describes her fascination for podcasts from other countries for learning about other cultures, as global podcast culture emerges - her magazine Podcast User has been going three months and is now being downloaded in 80 countries. In the longer version, &lt;A HREF="http://www.spainfulfilms.co.uk/" target=_blank&gt;Conrad Slater&lt;/A&gt; talks about and demonstrates the creative use of a small stereo condenser microphone.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;A HREF="http://funkwarehouse.com/mp3s/podcastnation/PCN_BBC_Britcaster_8.4.06.edited.mp3"&gt;Edited interview - 14:49&lt;/A&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;A HREF="http://funkwarehouse.com/mp3s/podcastnation/PCN_BBC_Britcaster_8.4.06.unedited.mp3"&gt;Unedited interview - 19:24&lt;/A&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;FONT SIZE=1&gt;© Deek Deekster 2006. Podcast Nation: &lt;i&gt;&lt;A HREF="http://podcastnation.co.uk/podblog/"&gt;"Nation Shall Cast Pod Unto Nation."&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;</description><link>http://www.five.org/blog/2006/04/uk-podcasters-meet-bbc.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Deek Deekster)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>2</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12130599.post-114254815956067135</guid><pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2006 22:28:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2006-03-17T20:32:00.116Z</atom:updated><title>Podsafe Or Not Podsafe?</title><description>&lt;FONT SIZE=1&gt;The following extract from the &lt;A HREF="http://britcaster.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=900"&gt;Britcaster Forum debate&lt;/A&gt; on proposed MCPS-PRS Podcast Licencing.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I have mixed feelings even about the whole "podsafe" concept - some of the best music i have ever heard in dance music especially, is completely 100% ILLEGAL - and superb all the same. I think it's necessary to maintain our magpie culture at grassroots level - as TS Eliot said, a mature artist steals - for it to be vital. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Once podcasting starts to seriously commercialise, gets easier, and hordes of talented newbies really start to appear, it will be a different thing altogether. people = money = which changes everything. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In the UK, Pre-Nominet, it used to be that in order to get a domain name, you simply went to the naming committee and asked for it. can you imagine anyone NOT charging for domain registrations now? &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Legislators and "authorities" everywhere have this kind of scenario in mind with the explosion of podcasting and the whole citizen-driven media thing. there are so many people doing it, and vested interests everywhere really want in. look how much Murdoch paid for MySpace. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In the end, the one thing that can damage podcasting as it emerges is bad legislation. There is a lot of educating to do of those who would legislate - explaining for e.g. podcasting is not file-sharing, not radio, nor publishing, nor broadcast - and that so long as it does no harm, it has the right to be treated as a new and different thing, and to evolve in relative freedom develop its own unique formats. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;That for me is worth doing and would be the primary reason for going back to MCPS-PRS, en masse, and saying to them, here's how we'd like to be, this is what we think is fair for the UK, this is what we think is equitable. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If we do it promptly, loud and clear, we might even be listened to. Which won't affect my rebellious and defiantly pioneering friends one iota, but which may make a lot of difference to the thousands of nice people who are all just about to show up and go podcast. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I guess we need to see what consensus there really is among UK podcasters on these issues. There is a poll here about the &lt;A HREF="http://www.podcastnation.co.uk/podblog/2006/03/uk-podcast-licence-poll.html"&gt;MCPS-PRS licensing scheme for UK Podcasters.&lt;/A&gt;</description><link>http://www.five.org/blog/2006/03/podsafe-or-not-podsafe.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Deek Deekster)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>1</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12130599.post-112089605081108528</guid><pubDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2005 07:58:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2005-07-09T09:03:27.076+01:00</atom:updated><title>G8 Fails To Save Planet</title><description>&lt;IMG SRC="http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/39325000/jpg/_39325418_heat_203_climate.jpg" align=left&gt;"At the heart of the communiqué is a disappointing failure by the leaders of the G8 unequivocally to recognise the urgency with which we must be addressing the global threat of climate change," he said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"Make no mistake, the science already justifies reversing - not merely slowing - the global growth of greenhouse gas emissions. Further delays will make the G8's avowed commitment in this communiqué to avoid dangerous impacts of climate change extremely difficult."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"In its communiqué the G8 talks of 'facing a moment of opportunity' while, at the same time, turning away from that moment." - Lord May of Oxford, President of the UK's academy of science, the Royal Society - BBC</description><link>http://www.five.org/blog/2005/07/g8-fails-to-save-planet.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Deek Deekster)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>1</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12130599.post-112076172105070838</guid><pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2005 10:30:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2005-07-07T19:42:01.056+01:00</atom:updated><title>London Paralysed By Bombs</title><description>All around me, explosions are rocking London, at least 6 since 8.45am, the nearest of which at Kings Cross happened a little over a mile from here. I can hear helicopters overhead and sirens from ambulances and police cars. The top deck of a bus was blown off in Tavistock Square. There are at least 2 dead, people have lost limbs, probably more than 100 injured. The capital's transport system, buses, underground, trains, has been totally stopped. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The London police chief Sir Ian Blair (not everyone in charge here is called Blair) just asked everyone here to stay where they are and not to call the emergency services unless life is threatened. Breaking news via the BBC is that Al Qaeda are claiming responsibility, 200 words on a European website laying claim to this death and destruction.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The atmosphere is so far calm, Londoners responding with customary stoicism. There is plenty of time to panic. It has not really sunk in yet. The phone networks are saturated. Images are just arriving from wrecked underground trains captured on mobile phones. People are still trapped at Kings Cross station, apparently.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;What a twist in this nation's history - one moment proud and happy hosts of the G8, celebrating for having won the Olympic bid, our leaders on a moral mission to make poverty history and save the planet, the next thing, solemn and tragic.</description><link>http://www.five.org/blog/2005/07/london-paralysed-by-bombs.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Deek Deekster)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>1</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12130599.post-112032685057929502</guid><pubDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2005 17:52:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2005-07-02T18:54:10.583+01:00</atom:updated><title>Live 8 Claims Moral High Ground</title><description>&lt;IMG SRC="http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/41258000/jpg/_41258175_gaypride_203.jpg"&gt;</description><link>http://www.five.org/blog/2005/07/live-8-claims-moral-high-ground.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Deek Deekster)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12130599.post-111945901108628049</guid><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2005 16:47:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2005-06-22T18:04:09.090+01:00</atom:updated><title>Chenigall Suseela, 14, Wins Divorce To Study</title><description>In a landmark victory for women's rights, Chenigall Suseela, a 14-year-old girl in the southern Indian state of Andhra Pradesh has won a battle to have her two-year marriage to a teenage boy annulled.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"It is thought the first time in the state's history a child bride has successfully fought the centuries-old tradition of marrying girls off young.Village elders agreed to grant Chenigall Suseela, who had threatened to commit suicide, the annulment. Suseela said that she wanted to go back to school. Her parents admitted they should not have married her off without her consent." - BBC News.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;FONT SIZE=1&gt;Also at &lt;A HREF="http://www.legendgames.net/showstory.asp?page=blognews/stories/WN0000244.txt"&gt;BNN&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/FONT&gt;</description><link>http://www.five.org/blog/2005/06/chenigall-suseela-14-wins-divorce-to.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Deek Deekster)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12130599.post-111843990269271169</guid><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2005 21:42:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2006-03-03T14:56:10.760Z</atom:updated><title>Five Podcast 9</title><description>&lt;A HREF="http://funkwarehouse.com/funk/cannabis/cannabis_march_london_05.mov"&gt;Ten minute documentary coverage of the Legalise Cannabis March and Rally, London, 15 May 2005. (24MB)&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;A HREF="http://feeds.feedburner.com/FIVE" title="Subscribe to Five Podcast Channel"&gt;&lt;IMG SRC="http://www.feedburner.com/fb/images/pub/xml_button.gif"&gt;&lt;/A&gt;</description><link>http://www.five.org/blog/2005/06/five-podcast-9.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Deek Deekster)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12130599.post-111697068064677344</guid><pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2005 21:11:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2005-05-24T22:47:50.026+01:00</atom:updated><title>Europe Leads Way In Third World Poverty Relief</title><description>The UN wants world poverty halved by 2015, and claiming a breakthrough in the fight against world poverty, today European nations agreed to increase to double its development aid to poorer nations. In five years time, the EU's aid to poor countries will be worth an extra £14 billion ($26 billion) annually. UK Chancellor Gordon Brown said "huge progress" had been made. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The 15 richest EU member states have agreed to set a new spending target - at least 0.51% of their national wealth - on the developing world by 2010. The other 10 poorer, mostly eastern European member states - who joined the EU last year - agreed a 0.17% target.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The goals, which were approved by UK International Development Secretary Hilary Benn and fellow EU ministers, are an attempt to revive momentum towards achieving a United Nations target to halve world poverty by 2015. The UN target would involve 0.7% of national wealth being spent on development by that date. The target, which was set 35 years ago, has only been achieved by four EU countries - Denmark, Sweden, Luxembourg and the Netherlands. Five others - the UK, France, Belgium, Finland and Spain - have set firm dates to meet it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;UK Chancellor Gordon Brown hailed the aid increase, but said it was now important to bring together all the world's richest nations to sign up to a single plan. He hoped the plan could be agreed when Britain chaired the G8 summit at Gleneagles in July. He said he was sure America would support efforts to increase the amount of aid going to the developing world. Mr Brown said: "What we have seen is all 25 European Union countries - the poorest and the richest - coming together to promise that aid, which was $40bn last year will be $80bn by 2010.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"So Europe is saying it will double aid. It is putting that money to health and education and particularly into Africa." - BBC&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Ditto &lt;A HREF=http://www.legendgames.net/showstory.asp?page=blognews/stories/WN0000165.txt&gt;BNN&lt;/A&gt;</description><link>http://www.five.org/blog/2005/05/europe-leads-way-in-third-world.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Deek Deekster)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>1</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12130599.post-111672415637561288</guid><pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2005 01:03:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2005-05-22T02:17:55.703+01:00</atom:updated><title>Mass Extinctions Threaten Future Of Humanity</title><description>The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA), the most comprehensive audit of the health of our planet to date, has published a warning that "if we continue with current rates of species extinction, we will have no chance of rolling back poverty and the lives of all humans will be diminished."  The MA has been drawn up by 1,300 researchers from 95 nations over four years.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"Changes in biodiversity were more rapid in the last 50 years than at any time in human history," said Dr Georgina Mace, the director of science at the Institute of Zoology, in London, UK, and an MA synthesis team member.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"And when you look to the future, to various projections and scenarios, we expect those changes to continue and in some circumstances to accelerate.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"Future models are very uncertain but all of them tell us that as we move into the next 100 years, we'll be seeing extinction rates that are a thousand to 10,000 times those in the fossil record." &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A third of all amphibians, a fifth of mammals and an eighth of all birds are now threatened with extinction. - BBC, MA&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Ditto &lt;A HREF=http://www.legendgames.net/showstory.asp?page=blognews/stories/WN0000156.txt&gt;BNN&lt;/A&gt;</description><link>http://www.five.org/blog/2005/05/mass-extinctions-threaten-future-of.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Deek Deekster)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>2</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12130599.post-111631582508249995</guid><pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2005 07:39:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2005-05-17T08:43:45.090+01:00</atom:updated><title>Mobile Phone Tumour Risk Three Times As Likely In Rural  Areas</title><description>"...country residents using digital mobiles were three times as likely to develop a tumour compared to urban users, who had about the same risk of brain tumours as the general population.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;For malignant brain tumours, the risk was eight times as high for those living in a rural area, but the numbers were very small, the researchers warned. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Lead researcher Professor Lennart Hardell said the cause of the increased risk seemed to be the higher emissions from the phones in rural areas because the base stations were further apart than they would be in cities and towns." - BBC News reports this &lt;A HREF="http://oem.bmjjournals.com/"&gt;Swedish Research&lt;/A&gt;.</description><link>http://www.five.org/blog/2005/05/mobile-phone-tumour-risk-three-times.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Deek Deekster)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12130599.post-111557635165887964</guid><pubDate>Sun, 08 May 2005 18:17:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2006-03-03T13:57:18.080Z</atom:updated><title>Five Podcast 8</title><description>&lt;A HREF="http://funkwarehouse.com/five/podcast/ukelection05/uk_election_round_up_2005.mp3"&gt;Deek Deekster discusses nuts, politicians, politics and podcasting&lt;/A&gt; with &lt;A HREF="http://international-bicycle-thief.blogspot.com/"&gt;International Bicycle Thief&lt;/A&gt; and rounds up coverage of UK election 2005 from &lt;A HREF="http://funk.co.uk"&gt;Funk.&lt;/A&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;A HREF="http://feeds.feedburner.com/FIVE" title="Subscribe to Five Podcast Channel"&gt;&lt;IMG SRC="http://www.feedburner.com/fb/images/pub/xml_button.gif"&gt;&lt;/A&gt;</description><link>http://www.five.org/blog/2005/05/five-podcast-8.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Deek Deekster)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>2</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12130599.post-111538628187414373</guid><pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2005 13:30:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2005-05-06T14:45:00.603+01:00</atom:updated><title>A Tremendous Honour And Privilege</title><description>It has been a tremendous honour and privilege to take part in the period drama of national transition.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I am watching today's TV with tea and ice cream, laughing at Peter Snow and the mad BBC Graphics.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Chastised Blair, biting his lip, promising to do better - "I.. We.. I, the Government" he said on the steps of Number 10, and "We've got to listen to the people" in that earnest voice of his. And that about summed it up for me. King Blair let off with a spanking. Pull your socks up, bring the troops home, stop the US bombing Iran, and make sure Palestine gets the West Bank back in full, you bad man.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Then the surprise of Michael Howard's magisterial statement of stepping down, having turned around his party's fortunes, determining to make sure the Conservative leadership selection process was reformed before he did so.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The LibDem massive has been bigged up, Charles Kennedy's frowning red face and confident stomp making him look just like a ginger partridge. He looks so lary! He's promising to make 3 party politics a reality. Actually that's a big change on the political map, and they won't be able to force ID cards on us so easily. A return to more truly parliamentary government is surely a good thing.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It took all the Labour big guns to win this, from Gordon Brown, instantly brought in from the cold to be a massive electoral asset, to prominent anti-war politicians like Robin Cook and Tony Benn. Will there be enough cohesion in the Labour party to survive Blair's passing?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This ritual loss of a night's sleep and obsession with minutae is something 24 hour news media has bred in some of the population but by no means all.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Earlier I overheard the following conversation: "Who won?" "Same lot." "You vote?" "Na." "Me neither."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I think I might have another cup of tea.</description><link>http://www.five.org/blog/2005/05/tremendous-honour-and-privilege.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Deek Deekster)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12130599.post-111537312555490979</guid><pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2005 09:48:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2005-05-06T10:52:51.200+01:00</atom:updated><title>Deek Deekster Retires From Politics</title><description>&lt;IMG SRC="http://funk.co.uk/funkbaby.jpg" width=50 align=left&gt;Deek Deekster has announced his retirement from politics, in order to spend more time unwinding.</description><link>http://www.five.org/blog/2005/05/deek-deekster-retires-from-politics.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Deek Deekster)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>1</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12130599.post-111534481978190105</guid><pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2005 01:59:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2005-05-06T03:00:19.786+01:00</atom:updated><title>Labour Hold Islington South</title><description>Emily Thornberry   Labour   12,345   39.9   -14.0&lt;br /&gt;Bridget Fox  Liberal Democrat  11,861  38.3  +10.2&lt;br /&gt;Melanie McLean  Conservative  4,594  14.8  +1.1&lt;br /&gt;James Humphries  Green  1,471  4.8  +4.8&lt;br /&gt;Patricia Theophanides  UK Independence Party  470  1.5  +1.5&lt;br /&gt;Andy the Hat Gardener  Monster Raving Loony Party  189  0.6  +0.6&lt;br /&gt;Chris Gidden  Independent  31  0.1  +0.1&lt;br /&gt;Majority  484  1.6   &lt;br /&gt;Turnout  30,961  53.6  +6.2</description><link>http://www.five.org/blog/2005/05/labour-hold-islington-south.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Deek Deekster)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12130599.post-111533967029902163</guid><pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2005 00:31:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2005-05-06T14:00:03.386+01:00</atom:updated><title>Islington South Recount On Cards</title><description>I have just returned from the count at the Sobell Centre, Islington, where I have seen Bridget Fox (LibDem) and Emily Thornberry (Labour) polling neck and neck. There is already talk of a recount.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;IMG SRC="http://five.org/blog/islington_recount.jpg"&gt;</description><link>http://www.five.org/blog/2005/05/islington-south-recount-on-cards.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Deek Deekster)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12130599.post-111531065421651144</guid><pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2005 16:05:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2005-05-06T14:34:40.080+01:00</atom:updated><title>Politically Correct And Incorrect Election Birds</title><description>&lt;img src="http://www.five.org/blog/electionworkers.jpg" /&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.five.org/blog/votenando.jpg" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Islington South and Finsbury - two polling stations off Upper Street, 3pm, 5/5/5.</description><link>http://www.five.org/blog/2005/05/politically-correct-and-incorrect.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Deek Deekster)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12130599.post-111531165443058211</guid><pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2005 15:45:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2005-05-05T18:39:31.913+01:00</atom:updated><title>Warm Spring Day Sees London Voter Turnout Up</title><description>&lt;IMG SRC="http://five.org/blog/electionsky.jpg" width=200 align=left&gt;Voter turnout in the densely populated urban consituency of Islington South and Finsbury, is so far up on the last general election in 2001, said Labour and LibDem workers outside the local school turned Polling station in Laycock Street, near Highbury Corner, London, this afternoon. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Both estimated a rise of between 2% and 3%, which suggests that the many predictions of low turnout could be wide of the mark. It has yet to be seen if this is localised. Weather conditions are favouring the south, north London experiencing pleasant sunny spells and occasional showers, while the north is experiencing damper conditions.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;FONT SIZE=1&gt;Ditto &lt;A HREF="http://www.legendgames.net/showstory.asp?page=blognews/stories/WP0000095.txt"&gt;BNN&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;</description><link>http://www.five.org/blog/2005/05/warm-spring-day-sees-london-voter.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Deek Deekster)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12130599.post-111530362508817367</guid><pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2005 14:32:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2005-05-05T15:33:45.096+01:00</atom:updated><title>Vote!</title><description>"I'm also proud of the way we do things here.  We're a small country, physically, but the system is elegant - it took minutes to present my polling card, collect the ballot paper and vote - fortunately we've no local elections here this time around for some reason though there are else where (I suspect this is something to do with being a Unitary Authority) - it's a strange and somewhat naive way of doing it.  But the fact that by 3(ish) tomorrow morning we will have an *actual* rather than predicted vote is something I think we ought to be proud of too.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If you are a British Citizen living in the UK then get out and vote or shame on you!  Regardless of who wins." - Dave O'Neill, &lt;i&gt;Atomic Razor&lt;/i&gt;</description><link>http://www.five.org/blog/2005/05/vote.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Deek Deekster)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12130599.post-111530175179721038</guid><pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2005 14:01:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2005-05-05T15:02:31.800+01:00</atom:updated><title>Vote Blair, Get Blair</title><description>"There are a great many similarities between Labour today and the Conservatives at the beginning of the 1990's. If Blair continues to push his agenda, the backlash that will eventually come about may make Labour's 18 years in the wilderness look like the blink of an eye." - balders, &lt;i&gt;The UK Today&lt;/i&gt;</description><link>http://www.five.org/blog/2005/05/vote-blair-get-blair.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Deek Deekster)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12130599.post-111530147672179440</guid><pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2005 13:56:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2005-05-05T14:57:56.726+01:00</atom:updated><title>Just Voted (Not) Labour</title><description>"Tony Blair and his servile fawning MPs in the commons ( Roche et al ) have only themselves to blame. Iraq, tuition fees, Civil liberties, PFI, David Blunkett, war on terror, the clampdown on immigrants and refugees is the reason i will not be voting labour.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I wonder how many people across the UK are saying the same thing." -  karenexile, &lt;i&gt;trousered elephant&lt;/i&gt;</description><link>http://www.five.org/blog/2005/05/just-voted-not-labour.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Deek Deekster)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12130599.post-111529937726719230</guid><pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2005 13:21:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2005-05-05T14:27:01.300+01:00</atom:updated><title>Tony Benn To The Rescue</title><description>"The 80-year-old former cabinet minister yesterday swallowed huge doubts about the Iraq war to spend three hours talking to a list of wavering voters provided by Labour campaign headquarters.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Mr Benn, ostracised as a socialist eccentric by Mr Blair for nearly 10 years, was rung by sheepish Labour officials at his London home. He said the call was a sign that Labour was in recovery. "To have them ring me to help them out, well it shows this election means Labour is returning to what it was."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;He admitted that his calls to a list of potential switchers had been hard going. "I am president of the anti-war coalition so there is no point saying Iraq has been anything but a disaster. I have been campaigning for 63 years and I will always support Labour. It is a trade union party and socialist party. It has done good things." - Guardian.</description><link>http://www.five.org/blog/2005/05/tony-benn-to-rescue.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Deek Deekster)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12130599.post-111529911870685508</guid><pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2005 13:16:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2005-05-05T14:18:38.810+01:00</atom:updated><title>Election Jitters</title><description>"Am I worried about the outcome of the UK General Election? Hell yeah! The pundits and the Press Corps have no idea what is going on in the marginals. The predictions are of a Labour victory with anything between a 10 and 100-seat majority. But if predictions are that precise then surely other outcomes, such as a hung Parliament or worse, cannot be ruled out.... I wonder how much of the PM's fretful performance will have put off undecided voters. Clearly the strategy was to alarm the Labour stay-at-homes into turning out and voting after all. Blair has shown plenty of political nous in the past though; perhaps I should suspend judgement and wait to see if his tactics this time have pulled the iron out of the fire again." -     Mike Brunavs, Yateley, Hants - &lt;i&gt;Left Thinking&lt;/I&gt;</description><link>http://www.five.org/blog/2005/05/election-jitters.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Deek Deekster)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12130599.post-111526832452954322</guid><pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2005 04:05:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2005-05-05T05:45:24.616+01:00</atom:updated><title>It's That Voting Time Again</title><description>Decision time is upon the British nation, and with as much as one third of voters undecided in key marginals there is still no definite indication of Labour's inevitable victory. The last NOP Poll puts Labour on 36% and the Conservatives on 33% which is within the margin of error to produce an upset Conservative win.</description><link>http://www.five.org/blog/2005/05/its-that-voting-time-again.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Deek Deekster)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>1</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12130599.post-111523542784577502</guid><pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2005 19:30:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2005-05-04T22:15:28.926+01:00</atom:updated><title>Official Monster Raving Loony Party Leads The Way On Votes At 16</title><description>&lt;IMG SRC="http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/1904095968.02.IN01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg" width=375&gt;&lt;br /&gt;There was widespread call today for votes at 16. The only UK party to have this policy in their manifesto is the Official Monster Raving Loony Party, and &lt;A HREF="http://funk.co.uk/2005/04/andy-hat-gardener.html"&gt;as Andy "The Hat" Gardener&lt;/A&gt; explains here, all their best policies get pinched. Abolition of the dog license, passports for pets...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"The UK's 1.5m 16 and 17-year-olds would become further alienated from the democratic process if they continued to be excluded from voting, claimed the Votes at 16 coalition. The group said that if people at 16 were able to leave home, get a full-time job, pay taxes, raise children and join the armed forces they should also be able to vote. 'They have considerable responsibilities...but adult society does not consider them responsible enough to vote' Louise King, Children's Rights Alliance&lt;br /&gt;Lowering the voting age could also help to reinvigorate the youth vote by forcing MPs to take an active interest in the issues that concern young people, they said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The group - which also includes the Children's Rights Alliance for England, British Youth Council and Children's Parliament in Scotland - have written to the party leaders, asking them to promise to extend the franchise.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The letter urged them to "demonstrate their faith in and respect for younger citizens by working to ensure that 16 and 17 year-olds are no longer unnecessarily denied a stake in their democracy".  Louise King, of the Children's Rights Alliance, said: "At 16 and 17, young people's lives are as rich and varied as at any other age. " - &lt;A HREF="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/vote_2005/frontpage/4511267.stm"&gt;BBC&lt;/A&gt;</description><link>http://www.five.org/blog/2005/05/official-monster-raving-loony-party.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Deek Deekster)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item></channel></rss>